start your own blog now!
 
Read other blogs...
[hello in there]
Fooled Again.
 

Thursday, June 22, 2006

"Cut and run liberals"

This is the oft repeated mantra of

right wing assholes. We have

a Vietnam of the 21st century,

with no end in sight.

A failed occupation, this is not

a war . The war is a war we are

fighting with the truth. The truth

must prevail.~ Hello in there

CUT-AND-RUN LIBERAL, AND PROUD OF IT
Stephen Pizzo, News for Real
Karl Rove is right when he calls us 'cut-and-run liberals.'
As you will see, the list of things we want to cut and run
from is a long one.
http://www.alternet.org/story/37808/

posted by txpoollover, 20:50 | link | comments

Wednesday, June 21, 2006

OUR PATHETIC STATE OF GOVERNMENT
Molly Ivins, AlterNet
Attention, scandal-ridden Republicans: if you are put in
charge of government, the least you can do is run it well.
http://www.alternet.org/columnists/story/37865/

posted by txpoollover, 18:20 | link | comments

Tuesday, June 20, 2006

Is the shit going to hit the

 fan for the Bush regime?

The illigitimate presidency

of  G. W. Bush is getting

some press coverage by

corporate media.~ Hello In There

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Announces Plan To Prosecute Architects Of Alleged
2004
Election Theft. 6-20
http://www.prweek.com/us/news/open/free/blogs/564483

Do we have a Fascist regime for a U.S. government?

read these 14 points you decide

George W Bush and the 14 points of fascism - Project for the OLD AMERICAN CENTURY

posted by txpoollover, 15:09 | link | comments

Monday, June 19, 2006

Who supports Bush?

I don't believe we have 28 to 38%

Ignorant Dumbasses out there.

It's all a sham the polls, the elections.

What do you think?

Why Do 33% Of Americans Still Like Bush?

Posted by: "Jerry Lobdill" lobdillj@charter.net   lobdillj

Sun Jun 18, 2006 7:57 am (PST)

http://www.bushwatch.net/bush.htm#father

Politics:
<http://chimpplanet.journalspace.com/?cmd=forward&entryid=4928>Why Do
33% Of Americans Still Like Bush?, Trebor Chram

Whenever I watch a TV news show on a conservative station like FOX, I
hardly ever hear any positive attributes about George Bush. I do
hear some on the side of religion, as he politically shows support
for their major causes regarding abortion, gay marriage, stem cell
research, etc. Also some say that his tax cuts (they don't say "to
the wealthy") promote increase in business and employment.

However, most of the time when I read, watch or listen to these right
wing pundits, they spend their time, 1, defending Bush from some
recent catastrophe, or 2. attacking "unpatriotic" Democrats and
Liberals who have spoken out against their leader. In most cases
they will use degrading adjectives to describe their enemies. They
will call them wimps, unpatriotic, and then some down and dirty words
I don't like to use.

Hardly ever do I hear, read or watch them debate the problem at
hand. In fact, it's as if there is no problem.

They act as if all is going well in Iraq, Bush had nothing to do with
the Katrina/FEMA problems, Bush does not approve of torture, The
U.S. does not send detainees to secret prisons to be tortured. It's
ok to hold detainees for years without the benefit of judicial
process since they are "enemy combatants" and not "prisoners of war".
And the latest reason for this war is about regime change and
democracy for Iraq - not WMDs.

If 33% of Americans believe President George W. Bush is doing a good
job, the question I ask is. "Why do these Americans like him?"

In my opinion, the reasons are varied.

1. Many of these people must be hard-core Conservatives or
Republicans, following their leader "right or wrong".

2. The ones who are conservatives and Republicans probably love him
because the left hates him. They elected Bush. Bush is a
Republican. Liberals and Democrats hate him. So, they support
him. They don't make mistakes when electing their leader.

3. In this 33%, you have the very wealthy that may not even care if
Bush is a Republican or a Democrat. All they care is that Bush gives
them large tax cuts. These are people who believe in being rich no
matter what and the more money they get from their president, the
more they love him. As long as the war and his other agenda does not
hit them negatively, they want him to remain in power. This is the
same group throughout the world that always supported right wing
dictatorships. These dictators were smart enough not to disrupt
property and wealth of the upper classes, so they remained happy and
never complained.

4. Even today, many in this 33% still believe the Bush
Administration propaganda infused in them through the media before
the war that Saddam and Iraq were directly involved in 9/11 and that
Saddam was an imminent and direct threat to the United States. Bush
defended them from this tyrannical dictator and now protects them
during his war on terror. They see the Democrats as being weak in
protecting this nation against the evil empires. They believe most
of what the propaganda media of FOX News and other major conservative
newspapers and radio pundits tell them. Many of these are the ones
that see themselves back in the Wild West with a Texas Sheriff who
single-handed hunts down criminals before they even commit any
crimes. Since he is protecting them, these citizens don't mind if he
tortures these possible criminals. if he holds them in his jail
without telling anyone and without judicial protection.

5. Bush is known as a born-again-Christian and as such can do no
wrong in the eyes of fundamental Christian groups in this
country. Although we cringe when we hear Arab countries that want to
follow the Islamic Sharia Law in their governments because of the
pain and suffering and death it causes their citizenship, many
Christians in this country would like to infuse Christianity and
religion into government and laws of the US. Bush pleases this group
by citing his religious beliefs by claiming to be against abortion,
gay marriage, stem cell research, and by approving of government
funding for religious charities. Just when he was loosing some of
this support, prior to the coming November elections, he proposed a
constitutional amendment to ban gay marriages. He knew there was no
wide support for approval of this amendment, but that was not his
goal. His intention was to win back some of the religious support he
may have lost by not doing more for Christian groups during his five
years in office. It doesn't hurt whenever he mentions that he speaks
to God and that God has guided him in his work.

6. There is a percentage of people in this country and part of this
33% that are basically ignorant. Not stupid, but just ignorant of
what is going on around them politically. They would even support
Bush if he were a Democrat. These are people who have generally
good-paying jobs and feel secure. They have some leisure time. They
don't have major money problems. They read mainly the headlines and
don't dig any further into the news. They don't hear or believe that
people suffer in this country from hunger or from lack of medical
services. They don't hear or care about suffering around the world
or those wounded or dead from wars, famines, tsunamis, earthquakes,
etc. They have it good. They pay their taxes. The Patriot Act or
the NSA wiretaps don't affect them as "they have nothing to hide".
They don't break the laws in their towns. There are no gays in their
immediate circle. Socially, most of them are a homogeneous
group. None of their children are fighting in Iraq or
Afghanistan. If it's not broken, don't fix it.

7. Finally, there is also a group that is very respectful of
authority, no matter if good or bad. They are the ones I would
categorize as stupid or brain-washed. These believe if someone is
elected to be the President of the great nation of the United States,
they can do no wrong. Anything this president does is only for the
good of its citizens. This president is honest, able and has no
personal gain in this job. He is only there for you. If he attacks,
it's because he is right in attacking. If he tortures, it's because
he is defending us. He would never hurt us. He, after all, works
for us and he does our bidding. He loves us like a father.

Trebor Chram identifies himself as "a liberal Florida resident who
'woke up' when the Bush nightmare was unfolding." This article first
appeared in Planet of the Chimps.

 

posted by txpoollover, 21:40 | link | comments

Monday, June 12, 2006

What to do about the Stolen Elections?

ELECTIONS & VOTING
Stolen elections and civil insurrection
By Jerry Mazza
Online Journal Associate Editor

http://onlinejournal.com/artman/publish/article_890.shtml>http://onlinejournal.com/artman/publish/article_890.shtml

posted by txpoollover, 08:20 | link | comments

Saturday, June 10, 2006

 
The Threat to the Internet is Real

Congress is pushing a law that would abandon the Internet's First Amendment -- a principle called Network Neutrality that prevents companies like AT&T, Verizon and Comcast from deciding which Web sites work best for you -- based on what site pays them the most. If the public doesn't speak up now, our elected officials will cave to a multi-million dollar lobbying campaign.

READ MORE AND TAKE ACTION!

Free Press: SaveTheInternet.com Coalition Statement on Passage of the COPE Act
http://www.commondreams.org/news2006/0609-03.htm

US politicians have rejected attempts to enshrine the principle of net neutrality in legislation.
Some fear the decision will mean net providers start deciding on behalf of customers which websites and services they can visit and use.
The vote is a defeat for Google, eBay and Amazon which wanted the net neutrality principle protected by law.
All three mounted vigorous lobbying campaigns prior to the vote in the House of Representatives…
During the debate House Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi, said that without the amendment "telecommunications and cable companies will be able to create toll lanes on the information superhighway".
"This strikes at the heart of the free and equal nature of the internet," she added…
Lots more really good stuff at MakeThemAccountable.com.
 
Carolyn Kay
MakeThemAccountable.com
Religious fundamentalists believe God gave us a brain, but doesn’t want us to use it.  Political fundamentalists believe the founders endorsed free speech, but didn’t want us to practice it.  Free market fundamentalists believe there should be no interference with markets, except by CEOs of gigantic corporations

posted by txpoollover, 15:04 | link | comments

So you think all the reporting,

on Corporate TV is telling you

the truth. Think again. Watch this Video!

~Hello In There

Loose Change - 2nd Edition

9/11: WILD CONSPIRACIES AND RATIONAL CONCERNS
Joshua Holland, AlterNet
Even when you cut through the conspiracy theories about 9/11
and head straight for the facts, the government's version
still seems fuzzy.
http://www.alternet.org/story/37046/

A documentary that exposes the truth about what really happened on 9-11.

posted by txpoollover, 11:10 | link | comments

Wednesday, June 07, 2006

RFK Jr: Taking the Stolen Election Seriously

By Thom Hartmann, AlterNet. Posted June 7, 2006.


In his Rolling Stone article, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. reveals how the Republican Party engaged in a criminal conspiracy to both steal the 2004 election, and to cover up evidence of the theft.

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has written a brilliant new article about the biggest political story in the history of the United States: An American politician illegitimately took the office of president by outright theft and fraud. Although such high crimes and misdemeanors have been rumored in previous elections, none in the history of the republic have been so thoroughly documented. George W. Bush is not the legitimate president of the United States.

posted by txpoollover, 16:18 | link | comments

Friday, June 02, 2006

 

Was the 2004 Election Stolen?

Republicans prevented more than 350,000 voters in Ohio from casting ballots or having their votes counted -- enough to have put John Kerry in the White House. BY ROBERT F. KENNEDY JR.

Like many Americans, I spent the evening of the 2004 election watching the returns on television and wondering how the exit polls, which predicted an overwhelming victory for John Kerry, had gotten it so wrong. By midnight, the official tallies showed a decisive lead for George Bush -- and the next day, lacking enough legal evidence to contest the results, Kerry conceded. Republicans derided anyone who expressed doubts about Bush's victory as nut cases in ''tinfoil hats,'' while the national media, with few exceptions, did little to question the validity of the election. The Washington Post immediately dismissed allegations of fraud as ''conspiracy theories,'' and The New York Times declared that ''there is no evidence of vote theft or errors on a large scale.''

But despite the media blackout, indications continued to emerge that something deeply troubling had taken place in 2004. Nearly half of the 6 million American voters living abroad never received their ballots -- or received them too late to vote -- after the Pentagon unaccountably shut down a state-of-the-art Web site used to file overseas registrations. A consulting firm called Sproul & Associates, which was hired by the Republican National Committee to register voters in six battleground states, was discovered shredding Democratic registrations. In New Mexico, which was decided by 5,988 votes, malfunctioning machines mysteriously failed to properly register a presidential vote on more than 20,000 ballots. Nationwide, according to the federal commission charged with implementing election reforms, as many as 1 million ballots were spoiled by faulty voting equipment -- roughly one for every 100 cast.

The reports were especially disturbing in Ohio, the critical battleground state that clinched Bush's victory in the electoral college. Officials there purged tens of thousands of eligible voters from the rolls, neglected to process registration cards generated by Democratic voter drives, shortchanged Democratic precincts when they allocated voting machines and illegally derailed a recount that could have given Kerry the presidency. A precinct in an evangelical church in Miami County recorded an impossibly high turnout of ninety-eight percent, while a polling place in inner-city Cleveland recorded an equally impossible turnout of only seven percent. In Warren County, GOP election officials even invented a nonexistent terrorist threat to bar the media from monitoring the official vote count…

After carefully examining the evidence, I've become convinced that the president's party mounted a massive, coordinated campaign to subvert the will of the people in 2004. Across the country, Republican election officials and party stalwarts employed a wide range of illegal and unethical tactics to fix the election. A review of the available data reveals that in Ohio alone, at least 357,000 voters, the overwhelming majority of them Democratic, were prevented from casting ballots or did not have their votes counted in 2004 -- more than enough to shift the results of an election decided by 118,601 votes. (See Ohio's Missing Votes) In what may be the single most astounding fact from the election, one in every four Ohio citizens who registered to vote in 2004 showed up at the polls only to discover that they were not listed on the rolls, thanks to GOP efforts to stem the unprecedented flood of Democrats eager to cast ballots. And that doesn't even take into account the troubling evidence of outright fraud, which indicates that upwards of 80,000 votes for Kerry were counted instead for Bush. That alone is a swing of more than 160,000 votes -- enough to have put John Kerry in the White House…

[T]he extent of the GOP's effort to rig the vote shocked even the most experienced observers of American elections. ''Ohio was as dirty an election as America has ever seen,'' Lou Harris, the father of modern political polling, told me. ''You look at the turnout and votes in individual precincts, compared to the historic patterns in those counties, and you can tell where the discrepancies are. They stand out like a sore thumb.''…

ROBERT F. KENNEDY JR.

Posted Jun 01, 2006 5:02 PM

Links to sources and commentary are here.

vote
Maybe the GOP just misunderstood this common refrain?

In a shocker of an article, sent in by filmmaker Matt Kohn, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. writes, in Rolling Stone:

what is most anomalous about the irregularities in 2004 was their decidedly partisan bent: Almost without exception they hurt John Kerry and benefited George Bush. After carefully examining the evidence, I've become convinced that the president's party mounted a massive, coordinated campaign to subvert the will of the people in 2004. Across the country, Republican election officials and party stalwarts employed a wide range of illegal and unethical tactics to fix the election.

 

On Exit Polls:

On the evening of the vote, reporters at each of the major networks were briefed by pollsters at 7:54 p.m. Kerry, they were informed, had an insurmountable lead and would win by a rout: at least 309 electoral votes to Bush’s 174, with fifty-five too close to call. In London, Prime Minister Tony Blair went to bed contemplating his relationship with President-elect Kerry.

 

 

As the last polling stations closed on the West Coast, exit polls showed Kerry ahead in ten of eleven battleground states – including commanding leads in Ohio and Florida – and winning by a million and a half votes nationally. The exit polls even showed Kerry breathing down Bush’s neck in supposed GOP strongholds Virginia and North Carolina. Against these numbers, the statistical likelihood of Bush winning was less than one in 450,000.

 

On Ohio:

 

[Ohio Sec of State Kenneth Blackwell] has openly denounced Kerry as ''an unapologetic liberal Democrat,''(50) and during the 2004 election he used his official powers to disenfranchise hundreds of thousands of Ohio citizens in Democratic strongholds. In a ruling issued two weeks before the election, a federal judge rebuked Blackwell for seeking to ''accomplish the same result in Ohio in 2004 that occurred in Florida in 2000.''

 

There's more. Much more.

The question remains: what to do with the information? Bush is the president till '08 and that isn't likely to change, but will the Democrats win back one or both Houses and will the political will be present even then to secure the election process?

What kind of Democracy is left if we don't? (Hat tip to Bradblog)

Listen to BBC investigative reporter and election hijacking expert Greg Palast discuss the fraudulent 2004 election with Robert Kennedy and Mike Papantonio on their Air America Radio program tomorrow, June 3, from 5 PM to 7 PM Eastern time.

posted by txpoollover, 05:29 | link | comments